aIt’s a long and painful wait, and we’ve finally got it Metal Gear Solid: Delta Snake Eater In our hands, and that’s all we expected from such a release. The opportunity to re-experience one of the best games of the PS2 generation is not something to be told, and we can’t stop gushing over and over again about it.
This feature will dive into the graphical side of your experience. Compare the original with a remake to see how wide the generation gap is. You’ll dig deep into each element of your presentation, so jump straight in.
Character model
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i05mxhiktoi
original Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater It was a graphical achievement of the era with best-in-class character models. The polycounts for each model were much higher than those of his time’s contemporaries, with more details on each side. Techniques such as softening the skin and elementary hair textures were commonly used at the time. You can also find it in the original release, but the end result is a great balance between performance and quality.
For the remake, Konami and Griduous use Unreal Engine 5, completely rewriting the characters and rendering the pipeline into something that pops out before the base release and posts boundaries. Starting with the skin mesh, you can see the rather geometrically complex representation of the skin mesh with great care, and you will see exponentially high polycounts.
The same story continues with other elements of the rendering pipeline. Here, physics-based materials systems are used in clothing similar to the solutions seen in the late final generation games and in the current generation releases.
Overall, there are obviously severe differences in the method Metal Gear Solid 3 The remake looks more like the original, but it deserves praise for its work, so the improvements come from the original and feel like they pay a legitimate homage to what came before. Of course, Konami went ahead and built all of these models from scratch, but it appears that the concept art and drawings are taken directly from the basic materials.
Enhanced cut scene
Thanks to some improvements in the character rendering department, the cutscenes also look much better than the base release. Konami doesn’t take away too much freedom to redirect these cutscenes, so each scene has been remade for the shot in the remake.
Looking at the cutscenes from the remake alongside the base version, the range from the lights in the movie helps reduce the mood of the scene through the extra light and shadows that the original version only takes up with a rudimentary baked light solution.
These improvements are used to better represent the state of these characters, as the facial models are much more detailed than before. It helps students achieve the epic movie vision that the team originally dreamed of, like expanding and moving facial muscles.
Also supporting cutscene cases is a more robust post-processing pipeline that adds film talent to the experience. Along with the quality depth implementation, you will see per-object motion blur in the cutscene, showing a much better density particle effect than what you saw in the base version. The rough implementation of light shafts, bloom effects and strobe lighting has been replaced by high quality current implementations, with the end result not taking a breath away from time to time.
Lighting, shadows, atmosphere
Next, move on to the lighting side of things. There you can see many radical changes. Base releases may not have dignified light shadow rendering that defines the original Debris Cellhowever, the implementation was certainly impressive – retaining a considerable amount of direct lighting details with some degree of accuracy.
However, for the remake, Konami uses Unreal Engine 5, which actually guarantees a best-in-class global lighting system thanks to Lumen technology. Improved technology allowed the system to capture more lighting data in a more accurate way. This is from both direct and indirect lighting sources that support bounce lighting.
Therefore, many details that you can see in the remake that felt lacking in the original production. Areas hidden from enemy gazes are clearer to understand thanks to the enhanced lighting pipeline, which also helps to improve the secret aspects of the core of the experience.
Having a detailed lighting system also helps to render better shadows, Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater There is no difference in this regard either. There are many improvements, including but not limited to self-shadows, soft contact shadows, and high-resolution shadows with little artifacts around the edges. The shadows are also cast over a long distance, giving a more uniform look.
Additionally, the assets have been rebuilt from scratch, with more geometric details this time. As mentioned in the character model, Polycount is also increasing thanks to the excellent use of Nanite. All of that comes to bring the world to life. Due to different assets, different materials now reflect different light, helping to give the world more character and reliability that cannot be achieved with base releases and the technical constraints that come with it.
Plus, a fairly smooth world streaming system has level of detail swapping happening fairly smoothly, resulting in a rather solid world pipeline. Of course, the direction of art plays a major role in achieving that vision, but the technical work is highly praiseworthy. Each follicle responds to movement, climbs a tree with geometrically dense bark and leaves, and crazes the long grass of the grass swimming in the water with large reflections and caustic renderings.
The true essence of Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake EaterThe gameplay is to be united with the jungle, and improved asset details and lighting system make the playground feel more realistic and help you achieve your original goals in a more efficient way.
Loading time and performance impressions
One of the biggest improvements that have occurred between the PS2 and PS5 generations was in terms of loading time, but unfortunately Konami has not made much progress in reducing the frustration that comes with maps split into multiple zones separated by loading the screen. Yes, the high read cleaning speed of the PS5’s SSD helps minimize load times (in my experience with the PS5 Pro, it was up to a few seconds), but it’s still there. Of course, the reason behind maintaining this feature is to get as close to the original experience as possible, but it feels pointless.
I took a little time to test the game on my PS5 Pro. And our experience was really good. Visuals looked crisp in 4K using PSSR and performance was pretty much fine, but there were some drops and slowing down here and there. However, given the pure white visuals and the calculation requirements of Unreal Engine 5, it’s a pleasant surprise to see the game at a decent level.
According to reports, for base PS5 owners, Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater The two graphical modes are fidelity modes that run at 4K at 30fps and performance modes that increase frame rates to full fat 60fps but lower resolution. The judges are still out about the performance of these two modes, but we recommend choosing the latter option.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Konami did a pretty amazing job Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater. It’s an equal part, a glorious respect for the past and a confident step forward in dealing with the modern crowd, and honestly, this is the perfect place for a game that is very closely associated with creators who are no longer part of this project.
Speaking only in graphical terms, Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater It makes great use of the tools provided by Unreal Engine 5 and makes it even more convenient for audiences familiar with modern games to try out this masterpiece. It has some drawbacks that are almost a byproduct of getting too close to the script, but it’s a great start.
